Infection prevention
Pathogens, blood and body fluids must be thoroughly removed to prevent cross-infection, with verifiable disinfection processes that withstand near zero-tolerance audits.
Hospitals & healthcare
Infection control is audited, wards are noise-sensitive, and cleaning under beds means long periods of bending. C5 handles public-area scrubbing; C2 wet-mops wards quietly.
Typical zonesInpatient lobbyInpatient wardsAdministrative building
The problem
Oil, dust, footfall and the hours you can clean decide the plan before a model does.
Sensitive environments
Sterile and high-risk zones such as operating rooms and ICUs, high-touch surfaces, and hard-to-clean equipment gaps each need different handling.
Safety and timeliness
Staff face exposure to pathogens, strong disinfectants and sharps, while emergency cleaning demands fast turnaround without compromising patient care.
One setup for the daily cleaning loop
The machines, the zones they cover and the records that prove what happened.
- 01Inpatient lobbyFloor scrubbingAt least 2 passes/dayC5
- 02Inpatient wardsQuiet wet mopping2 passes/day per ward areaC2
- 03Administrative buildingWet mopping / dust mopping2 passes/dayC2
Zone-based tasksZones scheduled by frequency
Digital managementTasks, coverage and anomalies stay traceable
Our approach
Three choices that change how the site runs.
Two models, two jobs
C5 scrubs lobbies and public areas; C2 handles inpatient wards and administrative buildings with quiet wet mopping.
Quiet enough for wards
C2 wet-mops quietly, so overnight work does not disturb patients, and it reaches under beds where staff would otherwise bend.
Stable obstacle avoidance
Deep-learning algorithms reliably detect and avoid wheelchairs, stretchers and pedestrians.
Before and after
The same work, before and after, on the metrics that matter to this site.
| Metric | Manual cleaning | With BRAWN robots |
|---|---|---|
| Manual cleaning load (single floor) | Multiple manual passes per floor | C5 and C2 cover ward cleaning together |
| Lobby cleaning frequency | 1 manual scrub per day | At least 2 scrubs per day |
| Residual water | Wet floors increase slip risk | Dual-chamber squeegee leaves less water |
| Physical strain | Long periods bending under beds | Robots take the repetitive work |
Comparison figures are typical-scenario estimates from the solution handbook, not client measurements.
How it is delivered
From the first survey to a running fleet: the same four steps on every project.
Site survey
A walk-through of areas, surfaces, obstacles, lift and access-control conditions, plus the plumbing available for a docking station.
Configuration and estimate
Model mix, zone plan, cleaning frequency and consumable estimate. A labour comparison is included only when the customer supplies a reliable baseline; the current answer set has no verified before-and-after labour case.
Deployment plan
Staging plan, charging and docking positions, network and lift integration scope, and a training schedule for the operating team.
Remote diagnosis
The cloud platform reports equipment status and faults, and self-check covers sensors, motors and the main controller. Partners receive remote technical support for genuine product faults; site-network, water or drainage problems remain site responsibilities.
Adjacent scenarios
The next scenarios in the line.
